« Foundation Diversity and Transparency Act | Main | The Copenhagen Consensus »

March 21, 2008

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e5503db982883400e5517b41db8834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Obama Had the Option:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

John Bonham

I happen to agree that Mr. Obama's relationship with Mr. Wright was far beyond that of a congregant sitting in a pew for an hour a week, and it is extremely telling of Obama's "new direction." The more interesting part of your commentary, being the tenacious religious nut that I am, is that you left the synagogue due to the racism and hypocrisy of its members (which I will take at face value). I have heard much the same said by many others who either stop attending church or bounce from one to another until they find one where they feel "comfortable." This leads me to ask what I think is an obvious question. What is the role of truth in church selection?

If you believe that your church has the fullness of unchanging objective truth, then the behaviours of its individual members, and even its clergy, is ultimately irrelevant. Discouraging, yes, embarrassing, yes, hypocritical, yes, angering, yes, but ultimately irrelevant. The truth doesn't change because people are flawed however seriously.

If on the other hand, you either a) don't believe your church contains the fullness of truth or b) you never think about it, or c) you just don't care one way or the other, then church for you is ultimately only a social club or a special interest gathering. I can only form an incomplete opinion on Obama's view of his church, but given the cursing from the pulpit by the pastor, the insane conspiracy theories, and the general spirit of anger, hostility and ego, I'm struggling to see how he claims that Mr. Wright is such a great spiritual teacher of gospels that purport to teach only humility, service, forgiveness, self-sacrifice, and the subsuming of one's own will. Maybe I'm just not enough of a biblical scholar to understand his theological treatise on "America Invented AIDS To Murder Blacks."

Back to your main point, my nine-year old nephew died of AIDS from a bad blood transfusion he got in a military hospital as an infant. I guess according the Mr. Wright they just mixed up the blood bags and he got the one intended for the black baby. How can Americans give Obama a pass on his outrageous, insane "mentor"?

Scott Perlman

John,

As I said, there were more reasons for my leaving the faith than just the hypocrisy of the people. As a non-believer, my opinion of what makes a church a church is somewhat irrelevant. But being irrelevant never stopped me from giving an opinion before so what the hell…

A physical building, the congregation, and the religious leader cannot or should not change the truth or your faith, period. On that subject I think we agree, if I understood you correctly.

My point is that given you are of a faith that has more than one church, I would select the one that has a leader and congregants that first, and foremost, do not violate the tenants of the faith.

Next, I would select a church that would challenge me, teach me, and in general help me grow as a follower of that faith. Please note that I am not placing the responsibility for my spiritual growth on the church. I recognize that would be between me and my god. But given a choice, I would choose one that supported that development rather than act as a benign or even counter force.

And finally, if the first two qualifiers are met I would select a church where I felt a true sense of community.

I assume Obama does not think that the government invented AIDS to rid the country of African Americans or that we put Mandela in prison. If true, my point is not that the ravings of a lunatic could impact his faith but that he could have found a church that was not lead by a lunatic. And I guess that aligns with your last question. ‘How can Americans give Obama a pass on his outrageous, insane "mentor"?’

PS - John, thanks for the feedback. I hope that with the practice I can organize my thoughts and present them with the clarity and wit found in your writings.


John Bonham

Scott,

In reading again what I wrote, I realize that my use of the word "you" in the second and third paragraphs could be read as "you, Scott." That was not my intent, as I was intending only to make a broad statement and not personalize my comments in any way. I should have instead said "a person."

I'm flattered by your compliments, but perhaps any wit I am imputed to possess is only because I write neither often nor long enough to expose the lie. With apologies to Lord Polonius, "Therefore, since brevity is the soul of wit, and tediousness the limbs and outward flourishes, I will be brief."

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment